Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals (可下载的档案资料, 1988) [Cleveland State University Libraries]
跳到内容
Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals 预览资料
关闭预览资料

Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals

著者: Falk, Patricia J
出版商: DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln 1988-01-01T08:00:00Z
版本/格式:   可下载的档案资料
提要:
The interaction of law and social science can assume a variety of forms; one of the most interesting of these concerns the use of social scientific information in legal opinions. While the "evolution" of courts' use of social science has been erratic and controversial, the current trend has been for increased incorporation of this information. A number of issues pervade the judicial use of social science, including  再读一些...
取得资料的在线复本... 取得资料的在线复本...

在图书馆查找

正在查找此资料的位置以及馆藏信息... 正在查找此资料的位置以及馆藏信息...

WorldCat

在全球的图书馆查找
全世界的图书馆都拥有这资料

详细书目

类型/形式: text
文档类型 档案资料
所有的著者/提供者: Falk, Patricia J
语言注释: ENG
OCLC号码: 729183325

摘要:

The interaction of law and social science can assume a variety of forms; one of the most interesting of these concerns the use of social scientific information in legal opinions. While the "evolution" of courts' use of social science has been erratic and controversial, the current trend has been for increased incorporation of this information. A number of issues pervade the judicial use of social science, including the relevance and accuracy of social science, resistance and ignorance by jurists, and judges' inability to obtain and evaluate social science. Further, there are tensions inherent in the role of social science vis-a-vis both traditionally legal questions and values. The empirical literatures on courts' use of social science are methodologically diverse and inchoate. Researchers have studied this phenomenon utilizing quantitative "citation count," qualitative, content analysis, survey, and "case study" methodologies. The focus of the instant research was to determine whether citations to social science, in the form of publications, experts, or generalized bodies of knowledge, varied across four substantive contexts involving gay litigants: child custody and visitation, employment discrimination, first amendment, and criminal sodomy cases. Additionally, the effect of four other case factors was examined: the presence of a minor, a constitutional analysis or a nexus analysis, and whether homosexuality was conceptualized in moral terms. Finally, two qualitative measures, degrees of detail and reliance, were employed. The results indicated that there was a relatively high number of gay "rights" opinions which contained at least one social scientific citation. While the four samples did not differ significantly in total number of citations to social science, they did vary in the frequency of citations to social scientific experts. In addition, the presence of a minor and of a nexus analysis significantly affected the incidence of citations to social science. T
有关这份资料的检索注释 有关这份资料的检索注释

评论

用户提供的评论

标签

争取是第一个!

相似资料

主题:(1)

确认申请

你可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.