Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals (Material de arquivo descarregável, 1988) [Cleveland State University Libraries]
pular para conteúdo
Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals Ver prévia deste item
FecharVer prévia deste item

Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals

Autor: Falk, Patricia J
Editora: DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln 1988-01-01T08:00:00Z
Edição/Formato   Material de arquivo descarregável
Resumo:
The interaction of law and social science can assume a variety of forms; one of the most interesting of these concerns the use of social scientific information in legal opinions. While the "evolution" of courts' use of social science has been erratic and controversial, the current trend has been for increased incorporation of this information. A number of issues pervade the judicial use of social science, including  Ler mais...
Obter a cópia on-line deste item... Obter a cópia on-line deste item...

Encontrar uma cópia na biblioteca

Obtendo a localização e disponibilidade deste item... Obtendo a localização e disponibilidade deste item...

WorldCat

Encontrar em bibliotecas globalmente
Bibliotecas ao redor do mundo possuem este item

Detalhes

Gênero/Forma: text
Tipo de Documento Material de arquivo
Todos os Autores / Contribuintes: Falk, Patricia J
Nota do Idioma: ENG
Número OCLC: 729183325

Resumo:

The interaction of law and social science can assume a variety of forms; one of the most interesting of these concerns the use of social scientific information in legal opinions. While the "evolution" of courts' use of social science has been erratic and controversial, the current trend has been for increased incorporation of this information. A number of issues pervade the judicial use of social science, including the relevance and accuracy of social science, resistance and ignorance by jurists, and judges' inability to obtain and evaluate social science. Further, there are tensions inherent in the role of social science vis-a-vis both traditionally legal questions and values. The empirical literatures on courts' use of social science are methodologically diverse and inchoate. Researchers have studied this phenomenon utilizing quantitative "citation count," qualitative, content analysis, survey, and "case study" methodologies. The focus of the instant research was to determine whether citations to social science, in the form of publications, experts, or generalized bodies of knowledge, varied across four substantive contexts involving gay litigants: child custody and visitation, employment discrimination, first amendment, and criminal sodomy cases. Additionally, the effect of four other case factors was examined: the presence of a minor, a constitutional analysis or a nexus analysis, and whether homosexuality was conceptualized in moral terms. Finally, two qualitative measures, degrees of detail and reliance, were employed. The results indicated that there was a relatively high number of gay "rights" opinions which contained at least one social scientific citation. While the four samples did not differ significantly in total number of citations to social science, they did vary in the frequency of citations to social scientific experts. In addition, the presence of a minor and of a nexus analysis significantly affected the incidence of citations to social science. T
Recuperando notas sobre este item Recuperando notas sobre este item

Críticas

Críticas contribuídas por usuários

Etiquetas

Seja o primeiro.

Ítens Similares

Assunto(s):(1)

Confirmar esta solicitação

Você já pode ter solicitado este item. Por favor, selecione Ok se gostaria de proceder com esta solicitação de qualquer forma.

Fechar Janela

Por favor, conecte-se ao WorldCat 

Não tem uma conta? Você pode facilmente criar uma conta gratuita.