Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals (Downloadbaar archiefmateriaal, 1988) [Cleveland State University Libraries]
naar inhoud
Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals Voorbeeld van dit item
SluitenVoorbeeld van dit item

Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals

Auteur: Falk, Patricia J
Uitgever: DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln 1988-01-01T08:00:00Z
Editie/materiaalsoort:   Downloadbaar archiefmateriaal
Samenvatting:
The interaction of law and social science can assume a variety of forms; one of the most interesting of these concerns the use of social scientific information in legal opinions. While the "evolution" of courts' use of social science has been erratic and controversial, the current trend has been for increased incorporation of this information. A number of issues pervade the judicial use of social science, including  Meer lezen...
Het online exemplaar van dit item wordt opgehaald... Het online exemplaar van dit item wordt opgehaald...

Zoeken een exemplaar in de bibliotheek

Bezig met ophalen van informatie over de locatie en beschikbaarheid van dit item... Bezig met ophalen van informatie over de locatie en beschikbaarheid van dit item...

WorldCat

Vind het in bibliotheken wereldwijd
Er zijn elders in de wereld bibliotheken die dit item in bezit hebben

Gegevens

Genre/vorm: text
Soort document: Archiefmateriaal
Alle auteurs / bijdragers: Falk, Patricia J
Opmerking taal: ENG
OCLC-nummer: 729183325

Samenvatting:

The interaction of law and social science can assume a variety of forms; one of the most interesting of these concerns the use of social scientific information in legal opinions. While the "evolution" of courts' use of social science has been erratic and controversial, the current trend has been for increased incorporation of this information. A number of issues pervade the judicial use of social science, including the relevance and accuracy of social science, resistance and ignorance by jurists, and judges' inability to obtain and evaluate social science. Further, there are tensions inherent in the role of social science vis-a-vis both traditionally legal questions and values. The empirical literatures on courts' use of social science are methodologically diverse and inchoate. Researchers have studied this phenomenon utilizing quantitative "citation count," qualitative, content analysis, survey, and "case study" methodologies. The focus of the instant research was to determine whether citations to social science, in the form of publications, experts, or generalized bodies of knowledge, varied across four substantive contexts involving gay litigants: child custody and visitation, employment discrimination, first amendment, and criminal sodomy cases. Additionally, the effect of four other case factors was examined: the presence of a minor, a constitutional analysis or a nexus analysis, and whether homosexuality was conceptualized in moral terms. Finally, two qualitative measures, degrees of detail and reliance, were employed. The results indicated that there was a relatively high number of gay "rights" opinions which contained at least one social scientific citation. While the four samples did not differ significantly in total number of citations to social science, they did vary in the frequency of citations to social scientific experts. In addition, the presence of a minor and of a nexus analysis significantly affected the incidence of citations to social science. T
Opmerkingen over dit item worden opgehaald. Opmerkingen over dit item worden opgehaald.

Beoordelingen

Beoordelingen door gebruikers

Tags

Wees de eerste.

Vergelijkbare items

Gerelateerde onderwerpen:(1)

Bevestig deze aanvraag

Misschien heeft u dit item al aangevraagd. Selecteer OK als u toch wilt doorgaan met deze aanvraag.

Venster sluiten

Meld u aan bij WorldCat 

Heeft u geen account? U kunt eenvoudig een nieuwe gratis account aanmaken.