Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals (ダウンロード可能な記録資料, 1988) [Cleveland State University Libraries]
コンテンツへ移動
Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals 資料のプレビュー
閉じる資料のプレビュー

Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals

著者: Falk, Patricia J
出版社: DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln 1988-01-01T08:00:00Z
エディション/フォーマット:   ダウンロード可能な記録資料
概要:
The interaction of law and social science can assume a variety of forms; one of the most interesting of these concerns the use of social scientific information in legal opinions. While the "evolution" of courts' use of social science has been erratic and controversial, the current trend has been for increased incorporation of this information. A number of issues pervade the judicial use of social science, including  続きを読む
この資料のオンライン版を取得中… この資料のオンライン版を取得中…

オフラインで入手

配置場所と利用可否を確認中… 配置場所と利用可否を確認中…

WorldCat

世界の図書館の所蔵状況
この資料を所蔵している世界の図書館

詳細

ジャンル/形式: text
ドキュメントの種類 アーカイブ資料
すべての著者/寄与者: Falk, Patricia J
言語注記: ENG
OCLC No.: 729183325

概要:

The interaction of law and social science can assume a variety of forms; one of the most interesting of these concerns the use of social scientific information in legal opinions. While the "evolution" of courts' use of social science has been erratic and controversial, the current trend has been for increased incorporation of this information. A number of issues pervade the judicial use of social science, including the relevance and accuracy of social science, resistance and ignorance by jurists, and judges' inability to obtain and evaluate social science. Further, there are tensions inherent in the role of social science vis-a-vis both traditionally legal questions and values. The empirical literatures on courts' use of social science are methodologically diverse and inchoate. Researchers have studied this phenomenon utilizing quantitative "citation count," qualitative, content analysis, survey, and "case study" methodologies. The focus of the instant research was to determine whether citations to social science, in the form of publications, experts, or generalized bodies of knowledge, varied across four substantive contexts involving gay litigants: child custody and visitation, employment discrimination, first amendment, and criminal sodomy cases. Additionally, the effect of four other case factors was examined: the presence of a minor, a constitutional analysis or a nexus analysis, and whether homosexuality was conceptualized in moral terms. Finally, two qualitative measures, degrees of detail and reliance, were employed. The results indicated that there was a relatively high number of gay "rights" opinions which contained at least one social scientific citation. While the four samples did not differ significantly in total number of citations to social science, they did vary in the frequency of citations to social scientific experts. In addition, the presence of a minor and of a nexus analysis significantly affected the incidence of citations to social science. T
注記を取得中… 注記を取得中…

レビュー

ユーザーレビュー

タグ

まずはあなたから!

類似資料

件名:(1)

リクエストの確認

あなたは既にこの資料をリクエストしている可能性があります。このリクエストを続行してよろしければ、OK を選択してください。

ウインドウを閉じる

WorldCatにログインしてください 

アカウントをお持ちではないですか?簡単に 無料アカウントを作成することができます。.